Why "Socialism" in Canada Is Not Communism
- Justin Thomas

- Nov 16
- 6 min read
Canada has never been close to communism — it's been one of the most stable capitalist democracies in history (crazy), with private property rights older than Confederation itself. Every country you have ever been told was "communist" never actually was.
Worse than that, the systems that came closest to the “communism” people fear look far more like modern American capitalism than anything Marx ever imagined.
1. What Communism Actually Means (Marx's Definition)
True communism, as Karl Marx defined it, requires five essential elements:
No private property — You cannot own land, homes, or businesses
No markets — No buying or selling of goods
No money — Currency does not exist
No state — No government apparatus whatsoever
No capitalism at all — Complete abolition of the profit system
Historical reality: This system has never existed anywhere on Earth — not in Soviet Russia, not in Maoist China, not in Cuba, not in North Korea. Every nation labeled "communist" maintained a powerful state apparatus, used currency, and operated centralized command economies that bore no resemblance to Marx's stateless vision.
Canada's reality: Canada meets none of these criteria. Not even close.
2. What "Socialism" in Modern Canada Actually Means
When Canadians talk about socialism, they are referring to social programs within a capitalist framework:
Universal healthcare — Publicly funded medical care
Public pensions — CPP and OAS for retirees
Social safety nets — Employment Insurance, GST credits, welfare programs
Labour protections — Minimum wage laws, workplace safety standards, union rights
Regulated capitalism — Markets operate freely, but with consumer and environmental protections
Mixed economy — Both private enterprise and public services coexist
What you still own in Canada:
Your home
Your business
Your car
Your savings and investments
Your personal property
Your ability to profit from your work
Private property rights are constitutionally protected. Markets operate daily. Entrepreneurs start businesses. None of Canada's social programs abolish ownership or markets.
3. Social Democracy Is Capitalism + Fairness, Not Communism
Modern Canadian "socialism" is actually social democracy, which operates on a simple principle:
Capitalism handles production — Businesses compete, innovate, and generate wealth through market mechanisms
Public systems handle distribution — Healthcare, education, and basic needs are guaranteed regardless of income
This model is successfully used by:
Sweden
Norway
Denmark
Finland
Iceland
Germany
The Netherlands
These nations consistently rank among the world's highest in:
Quality of life
Economic freedom
Innovation
Business competitiveness
Individual happiness
They did not replace capitalism — they made it work for more people.
4. What Canadian Socialism Does NOT Do
Let's dispel the myths clearly:
Does not seize your home — You own your property outright
Does not abolish markets — Stores, businesses, and trade function normally
Does not eliminate private enterprise — Small businesses and corporations thrive
Does not remove personal freedom — Democratic rights remain fully intact
Does not force income equality — People earn different amounts based on their work
Does not create Soviet-style control — No central planning of the economy
These are Cold War-era misconceptions that have no connection to how modern mixed economies actually function.
5. The One-Sentence Truth
Modern socialism is not communism — it's capitalism with guardrails: markets drive production and innovation, public systems guarantee basic human needs, and prosperity doesn't depend entirely on your bank balance.
Why This Distinction Matters
Conflating social democracy with communism is not just inaccurate — it prevents honest discussion about policy. When someone proposes universal dental care or affordable housing initiatives, they are not advocating for the abolition of private property. They are suggesting adjustments to how a capitalist economy distributes its benefits.
You can disagree with specific policies. You can debate whether public healthcare is more efficient than private insurance. You can argue about tax rates and the size of government.
But calling these policies "communism" is factually wrong — and it shuts down the conversation before it begins.
Canada is a capitalist country with social programs. It always has been.
So, What Do People Really Mean When They Say "Communism"?
Most of the time, when Canadians accuse something of being "communist," they aren't referring to Marx's actual definition. They're reacting to a shallow pop-culture caricature — an image built through Cold War propaganda, Hollywood villains, and a century of political fear-mongering.
But here's the kicker: The systems people think of as "communism" — the USSR under Lenin and Stalin, Maoist China, North Korea — were not communist. Not even close.
They were something else entirely.
Leninism and Stalinism: What People Mistake for "Communism"
Leninism (1917–1924)
After the Russian Revolution, Lenin faced an inconvenient reality: Russia was not economically developed enough for communism.
Marx explicitly said communism could only emerge after advanced capitalism had built the industrial foundation. Russia was barely out of feudalism. It had no such foundation.
So Lenin built something else:
A powerful centralized state
A one-party political system
A command economy run by bureaucrats
State-run industries that still used money, markets, wages, and hierarchical management
Lenin openly admitted this was not communism — he called it "state capitalism," a transitional phase he hoped might eventually lead to socialism.
It never did.
Stalinism (1924–1953)
Stalin took Lenin's transitional system and hardened it into a full authoritarian machine:
Massive industrial capitalism run by the state
Extreme nationalism and cult of personality
Forced labour camps (the Gulag system)
A hierarchical police state with total surveillance
Wages, currency, bosses, prices — all still intact
Production targets, surpluses, deficits — all fundamentally capitalist concepts
This wasn't communism.
It was state-run capitalism with no political freedom.
Marx's vision required:
No state
No class hierarchy
No currency
No markets
No coercion
Stalinism had the exact opposite of every single one.
The Uncomfortable Truth
The systems people call "communist" were actually authoritarian state capitalism — just with the government playing the role corporations usually play in the West.
They were not a "worker-run paradise."
They were top-down capitalism with:
CEOs replaced by party officials
Corporations replaced by ministries
Profit replaced with production quotas
Business monopolies replaced with state monopolies
Strip away the aesthetic differences, and the underlying economic logic is remarkably similar.
Why This Looks More Like Trump's America Than Marx's Communism
If you compare the underlying structure — not the rhetoric, not the symbols, but the actual mechanics of power — Stalinist state capitalism and modern authoritarian-leaning capitalism share some striking features.
Let's be specific:
1. Strongman Leadership
Stalin: Demanded absolute loyalty to the leader above all institutions
Trump: Demands personal loyalty above institutional loyalty (firing those who won't pledge allegiance)
2. Centralized Power
Stalin: Controlled courts, media, unions, and all state apparatus
Trump: Attempted to control courts (loyalty litmus tests), media (attacks on press), and openly states he will consolidate power if re-elected
3. Oligarchy
Stalinist elites: The nomenklatura lived like feudal lords while workers struggled
Modern U.S.: Billionaire oligarchs control policy, media, and markets while wealth inequality reaches historic levels
4. Suppression of Dissent
Stalin: Crushed political opposition through imprisonment and violence
Trump: Attacks the press as "enemies of the people," threatens political opponents with prosecution, undermines election integrity, and encourages violence against critics
5. Capital Accumulation at the Top
Stalinist system: Party elites extracted wealth from the masses
U.S. today: The top 1% owns more wealth than the bottom 90%, mirroring oligarchic systems more than functional democracies
6. Worker Exploitation
Stalin: Used forced labour camps and suppressed worker organizing
U.S. system: Uses prison labour (13th Amendment exception), union suppression, wage theft, and "right-to-work" laws to keep labour costs minimal
Different in degree? Yes.
Different in kind? Not as much as some would like to think.
And certainly not communist.
So Let's End the Myth.
Canada Has Never Been Close to Communism
Not under the NDP.
Not under the Liberals.
Not under the Conservatives.
Not ever.
Canada has always maintained:
Private property rights (protected by the Constitution)
Competitive markets
Corporate ownership
A private banking system
Private investment and capital markets
Free trade agreements
Profit incentives for business
Stock exchanges and financial instruments
All of these are protected and encouraged by law.
Even the most progressive NDP platform in Canadian history has never proposed:
Abolishing markets
Eliminating money
Dissolving the state
Ending private ownership
Dismantling capitalism
Because that would be communism — and communism has never existed anywhere, even in the countries people claim were communist.
The Truth: Canadian "Socialism" Is Just Social Democracy
When Canadians say "socialist," they usually mean:
Public healthcare
Workers' rights and collective bargaining
Fair wages and labour protections
Public pensions (CPP/OAS)
Affordable housing initiatives
Public infrastructure and transit
Consumer and environmental protections
Progressive taxation
This is not communism.
It's capitalism with a conscience — capitalism with guardrails that prevent the worst outcomes while preserving market innovation and personal freedom.
The same model is successfully used by:
Norway
Denmark
Sweden
Finland
Germany
The Netherlands
Iceland
New Zealand
Not one of these countries is communist.
They are highly competitive capitalist economies that ensure a basic floor of dignity for all citizens. They consistently rank among the world's leaders in:
Economic freedom
Innovation
Business competitiveness
Quality of life
Individual happiness
Social mobility
That's all Canadian social programs are trying to achieve.
Final Word
Communism, as Marx defined it, has never existed.
Leninism and Stalinism — the things people think are communism — were just brutal forms of state capitalism with authoritarian political control.
Canada has never resembled either.
What we actually practice — and what most people are arguing about when they discuss "socialism" — is simply social democracy, one of the most stable and prosperous forms of capitalism ever created.
If someone calls Canadian social programs "communism," they don't understand communism, they don't understand capitalism, and they don't understand Canada.
They're reacting to a ghost.
A spectre from Cold War propaganda that was never real to begin with.




Comments